Environmental and Social Assessment and Management System: BAF Environmental and Social (E&S) policy is currently focused on compliance to E&S laws and regulations in Vietnam. BAF farms apply VietGAP in eight (out of 13) of pig farms with plans to adopt internationally recognized standards and systems for the existing and planned feed mills. Food Safety (FS MS) is also planned for slaughterhouse and meat processing plants by 2024. To support its commitment towards IFC PS requirements for this investment, BAF will upgrade its E&S policy, as part of its E&S Management System (ESMS), to meet Good International Industry Practice (GIIP) and by extension of this commitment will define its E&S performance against these PS’ benchmarks for the operations being financed by IFC (ESAP#1).
Identification of Risks and Impacts: BAF has been adhering to the Vietnamese regulatory requirements for new feed mills and pig farms constructed so far. This process involves engaging a qualified consultancy to undertake the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) study (with dedicated internal resources to oversee) and having this verified by the regulatory authority (Provincial Department of Natural Resources and the Environment - DONRE) that issues the environmental permit prior to construction. Based on the identified E&S risks from the proposed operations, BAF is required (at each site) to submit periodic (semestrial) environmental monitoring reports. The EIA reports for all farms typically assess the impacts from construction and operation phase and include: (i) use of natural resources (energy/water consumption and management of wastes); (ii) odor management and mitigation of GHG emissions from animal waste through the application of on-site biogas capture systems, including proposed use of methane gas for energy generation; (iii) wastewater 100% treated and recycled into a closed water management system (for new sites being financed by this investment). Review of sample EIA reports for pig farms and feed mills confirm appropriate mitigation measures set out to address the key E&S risks and impacts. The EIAs, however, fall short in the assessment of impacts on biodiversity, community health and safety and social impacts including land acquisition and resettlement, impacts on ethnic minorities, and stakeholder engagement. With regards to the 11 assets where EIAs have been developed, the EIAs will be updated with a supplemental ESIA to comply with PS1 requirements. Based on the supplemental ESIAs, recommended mitigation measures will be implemented (ESAP #2). Going forward, as part of its ESMS (ref. ESAP #5), BAF will also develop an E&S impact assessment and management procedure (including relevant Terms of Reference) to conduct IFC PS compliant ESIA for the future assets where IFC’s use of proceeds will be utilized.
BAF engagement process with rental farms and acquisition of existing operations includes a legal due diligence (at point of engagement with landlord) requiring the proposed partner to verify its legal/permit documentation. This legal documentation includes land title/lease, relevant business, environmental permits, and proof of environmental monitoring. In cases of rental farm engagement, BAF evaluated the wastewater treatment system, and if necessary, invest in closed wastewater treatment and recycling. BAF currently does not have its own centralized system, albeit sharing the same legal department with Tan Long Group, to track legal and regulatory compliance of all entities , particularly of rental farms. Going forward, as set forth in ESAP #3, BAF will develop a consolidated legal/regulatory (permits) register, as part of its ESMS, for applicable EHS requirements for all current and planned pig farms operations under this project which will include (i) all existing environmental permits received for existing operations; (ii) provide proof of annual monitoring report submission in accordance with national regulations, including effective implementation of mitigation measures identified during environmental risk screening process; and (iii) demonstrate compliance to all terms and conditions of the environmental licenses. These reports shall meet applicable Vietnamese legal and regulatory requirements, IFC PSs and WBG EHS Guidelines, including guideline levels for air emissions and effluents. Any deviations will require a Corrective Action Plan (CAP), including timeline and assigned CAPEX/OPEX resources.
BAF develop each project with a project team which comprises operational and technical members and one Environmental Specialist (who reports directly to BAF Board of Directors) who is tasked with the oversight of the EIA Study and community engagement/outreach process. This role is mainly focused on new projects to ensure compliance to environmental permit issuance. There is no on-going scope of E&S monitoring for this role. Nor is it clear how the scope of this environmental specialist role is extended to include feed mills, farms and future slaughterhouse and meat processing operation. As set forth in ESAP #4, BAF will further consolidate its EHS function through recruitment of an E&S Technical Director and increased number of qualified EHS staff to further develop the corporate EHS/FS management systems and oversee the E&S performance of all BAF facilities (one full time Technical Director and four full time competent EHS officers at corporate level is expected, including a dedicated social personnel responsible for land management and community aspects).
At time of this appraisal, BAF had four new pig farms under construction and six rental units under consideration. All proposed and constructed pig farms are within rural locations with secondary data highlighting the likelihood of impacted stakeholder groups, ethnic minorities, risks associated with land acquisition/compensation, and potential biodiversity (ref. PS5/PS6 section below). The anticipated expansion in pig farm capacity with this IFC investment will significantly increase the footprint of the pig farm operations. Although BAF has developed a site selection checklist that analyzes key criteria, including biosecurity considerations, distance from local communities, access to transportation, water and electricity availability, verification of legal ownership of seller and land use designation classified as agricultural, this checklist does not include any screening on land acquisition approaches taken by the proposed lessors or presence of ethnic minority groups in the area. Going forward, as set forth in ESAP #5, BAF will upgrade its Site Selection Checklist to ensure that IFC PS5, PS6, and (as applicable) PS7 risks and impacts are timely addressed during the due diligence process. This site screening will include a commitment to exclude projects with potentially significant E&S impacts (i.e., areas where significant involuntary resettlement would be required, or lands to which ethnic minorities maintain collective attachment and would trigger free prior and informed consent (FPIC) or sites that are within critical habitats).
All farms apply strict biosecurity protocols, with eight farms being VietGAP certified with a plan in place to certify all farms to Global GAP by end of 2024. Feed mill operations stated that it maintained standardized OHS approaches which include work permit system, such as working at height, confined space, hot works, and good housekeeping guidelines to reduce dust related risks. BAF plans to develop and achieve FS MS certification linking slaughter, processing and retail JVs. BAF have no formal process for oversight of existing farm operations, rented and contracted construction operations, while documented proof of feed mill corrective actions provided is not considered as meeting IFC expectations (see PS1. Management section below). As set forth in ESAP #6, BAF will further establish its corporate level ESMS to include the full scope of E&S risks across its farms, feed mills, and slaughter operation in accordance with IFC PSs, WBG EHS Guidelines, and relevant GIIPs.
Management Programs: BAF current focus is to achieve compliance to prevailing Vietnamese regulations within each division (farms, feed, slaughter). As mentioned above, there is no overarching EHS MS installed at corporate and operational level that helps each entity achieve a demonstrated standard of GIIP. All BAF farms have wastewater treatment (WWT) system. BAF farms apply zero discharge approaches to WWT facilities in all new farms with all water recycled back into the farms. This is only applied to new facilities with existing facilities discharging treated wastewater to the natural environment with water quality parameters aligned to GoV requirements. Feed mill operation focus on regulatory compliance. Future slaughterhouse and meat processing plant will incorporate a FS MS aligned to EU standards. Although it is recognized that these approaches address some PS1 elements, the process does not include active E&S monitoring and review of the operations, nor alignment towards GIIP performance-based requirements. To ensure greater E&S monitoring oversight and prepare BAF for its proposed expansion, a BAF level ESMS needs to be established based on its updated corporate policies (ESAP#6), and to apply IFC PSs and GIIP requirements (ref. ESAP#3) defining expected E&S performance benchmarks for the operations proposed under this financing.
Organizational Capacity and Competency: At BAF corporate level, there is a Project Team (overseeing new farm development) which includes an environment personnel that directly manages all E&S issues, including engaging with consultants for the EIA Study and overseeing minimum specifications for compliance to agreed environmental permit’ Terms and Conditions (T&Cs) and stakeholder engagement (mainly during the environmental permitting process). The internal control division and the respective subsidiary director are in charge of supervising EHS compliance at each facility (including OHS management). Within the feed mill operations, all E&S monitoring is currently managed by the general manager. With the planned expansion including the future development plans of slaughterhouse and meat processing plant, increased in compliance, and expectations of meeting GIIP needs, BAF will require significant additional human resources to support and guide this implementation. This additional resource is required to manage the operational E&S needs, including land management and community aspects, and ensure that all new projects and actions under BAF expansion plan, are developed in a manner aligned to IFC PS requirements (Ref. ESAP#4).
Emergency Preparedness and Response: BAF feed mills have in place firefighting and rescue plans based on the local government regulatory requirements. Existing operating feed mills are supported with firefighting drills and annual fire drill testing. However, the Rico feed mill in Tay Ninh no longer had in place valid firefighting/emergency response plans upon its reopening after 5 years hiatus. As set forth in ESAP #7, BAF shall develop a risk assessment matrix that will be applied across farms, feed, and slaughterhouse businesses and operations to define ERP needs. As applicable this risk assessment shall consider risks to livestock, employees, environment, and stakeholders in an emergency event. It shall also assess the risks from climate related events on infrastructure such as excessive rainfall, drought, or fire. Management of potential wastewater treatment plant accidents and liquid waste release from farms. It shall also include evaluation of explosive dust risks from mill operations especially from sites in proximity to stakeholders.
Farm operations include ERPs for the management of biosecurity related needs. For the slaughterhouse and meat processing facilities, there is a plan to install a FS MS which will include recall procedures. There are currently no ERP plans for the pig farms, especially in case of WWT plant spillages that could result in accidental discharge to surface water bodies or the natural environment. BAF stated that all WWT systems are designed with standby storage ponds that can be used to temporarily hold wastewater in emergency cases (ref. ESAP#6).
Monitoring and Review: There is no E&S monitoring and review at BAF level for each business segment. At the facility level, as required by the environmental permits, WWT plant discharge will be monitored for the farm operations by third party consultants and submitted to the DONRE. Monitoring of BAF feed mills is in accordance with the environmental permits. For new pig farms, all WWT plants will recycle 100% of treated wastewater. Proposed slaughterhouse and meat processing plant monitoring will be required to submit periodic reports in compliance with EIA. Responsibilities for EHS monitoring rests with the internal control division and with the respective subsidiary director to supervise compliance. Going forward, corporate and plant-level EHS/social Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) will be developed by class of assets to demonstrate meeting performance-based requirements as defined in WBG EHS General and Sector Specific Guidelines (ref. ESAP#6).
Supply Chain Risk Assessment and Management: Raw materials sourced for the feed mill are broadly sourced from a combination of the BAF Holding Company (Tan Long Group - TLG) and from local suppliers. The main product sourced domestically is wheat bran, mostly sourced from local mills using imported raw materials. Once the expansion of the four mills is completed, production capacity will increase to 600,000-1,000,000 MT capacity. At the time of the appraisal, BAF had not adopted a Supplier Code of Conduct for its sourcing operations, including defining a sustainable sourcing plan to supply these facilities. To manage the E&S related risks of its sourcing operations against PS2/PS6 supply chain requirements, BAF will be required to adopt such Supplier Code of Conduct and define risk-based approach to sourcing material inputs for its feed mill operations. Going forward, BAF shall develop a Sourcing Policy, including establishing supplier database/mapping, developing supplier evaluation criteria for IFC PS2 and PS6 supply chain requirements to qualify its raw material suppliers and ensure independent verification. The implementation of this Supplier Code and management procedures will be done through EHS corporate function and/or sourcing team. (ESAP#8)