Environmental and Social Assessment and Management System. To manage the environmental and social risks across all of its operations, CHO has developed an integrated strategy and framework for addressing environmental, health and security, food safety and quality (EHSQ) issues across its operations, which is reflected in the Integrated Management Manual (created in April 2006 and last revised in September 2014).The specific elements of the framework are described in further detail in each of the sections below. The framework can generally be considered to be consistent with the requirements of this Performance Standard and by addressing the action items as outlined in the ESAP, CHOs framework, moving forward, can be expected to be in compliance with this Performance Standard.
Furthermore, CHO has received/is in the process of receiving the following certifications at the level of individual production units: 1) ISO 14001:2004 for the environmental management system of the bottling facility is pending as of 4 February 2015 (and CHO anticipates to roll this out to all other sites by 2019); 2) ISO 9001:2008 for the quality management system is valid until 12 July 2016 for the oil press and until 22 July 2016 for the bottling and refining facility, the soap manufacturing facility as well as the extraction processing facilities at Chrarda and El Amra; 3) ISO 22000:2005 for the food safety management system is valid until 30 October 2016 for the bottling facility; 4) BRC Global Standard for Food Safety for the food safety management system is valid until 5 November 2015 for the bottling facility; 5) IFS Food for the food quality and safety standards of the bottling facility is valid until 9 November 2015; and 6) IFS HPC for the cosmetic manufacturing practices of the soap manufacturing facility is valid until 24 June 2015. CHO is in the process of expanding the scope of the existing certifications in a phased approach over the next five years.
As part of the ESAP, CHO shall expand the systems currently already in place such that these function as an overarching framework for managing the environmental and social aspects across all CHO sites. This will ensure that CHO activities are undertaken in compliance with the requirements of National Laws, internationally recognized standards and certifications (ISO 14001, ISO 9001, ISO 22000, BRC, IFS Food and IFS HPC, and certificates for the organic production of olive oil and soap), and any additional aspects as contemplated under the principles of IFCs Performance Standards (for example as related to CHOs supply chain and stakeholder engagement), as well as that any new risks and impacts that are identified through implementation of the framework are addressed by developing the necessary management programs to mitigate these.
Policy. CHO has established: 1) an environmental policy, which reflects the Companys commitment to meet Tunisian legal and regulatory requirements and to implement an environmental management system that currently meets ISO 14001:2004 for the bottling facility (pending as of 4 February 2015); and 2) a quality policy, which reflects the Companys commitment to implement practices that ensure product quality (ISO 9001:2008 for the quality management system for the oil press, bottling and refining facility, soap manufacturing facility as well as the extraction processing facilities at Chrarda and El Amra; ISO 22000:2005, BRC Global Standard for Food Safety and IFS Food for the food safety management system for the bottling facility; and IFS HPC for the cosmetic manufacturing practices of the soap manufacturing facility). CHOs policy also includes a commitment to product quality as demonstrated through various product certifications (certificates for the organic production of olive oil and soap). Both policies were signed by the CEO and communicated to the employee.
Identification of Risks and Impacts. In accordance with Tunisian law, CHO completed separate Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) for each of the operating facilities, which were approved in 2006 and 2010 by the Tunisian National Agency for Environmental Protection. The EIA approval process also entailed issuance of a certificate demonstrating operations safety, dated 1 November 2006, which was renewed on 9 January 2015. As part of this process, CHO completed a Job Hazard Analysis by job function and by incident (fire or explosion) at the facility level. As required under National Law, the certificate is valid for two years and CHO has already initiated the review process across its operations, which is due to be completed by the end of 2015.
CHO undertook additional identification of risks and impacts as part of the process for obtaining various certifications for the following operational units: 1) at the bottling facility and refinery plant (ISO 14001, review undertaken in 2013 and revised in 2014; ISO 22000, BRC, and IFS Food including a Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) review in 2010 and revised in 2014); and 2) at the soap processing facility (IFS certification for the manufacturing of cosmetics, review conducted in 2014). CHO has also started the process of reviewing its current health and safety practices against the requirements of the OHSAS 18001 standard on occupational health and safety. As noted above in the Environmental and Social Assessment and Management System Section, CHO is in the process of expanding the scope of the existing certifications, which will entail additional identification of risks and impacts at each of the operational units over the next five years.
As part of the ESAP and based on a risk-based approach, CHO shall revise the order of priorities for undertaking the additional review of risks and impacts as required under the different certification schemes to address: 1) environmental risks and impacts associated with the physical and chemical extraction plant at Chrarda; the soap processing facility; the physical extraction plant at El Amra; the oil press; and the warehousing facility; and 2) risks related to food safety practices (HACCP) at the warehousing facility; the refinery; and the oil press.
Management Programs. As part of the EIA approval process, CHO was required to implement specific Environmental Management Plans to manage environmental aspects related to operations as well as Improvement Plans related to operations safety operations. CHOs Integrated Management Manual lists Standard Operating Procedures that apply to all operations and include the following: Hygiene, Hazardous Waste Management, Chemical Materials Management, Emergency Preparedness/Response and Product Recall, Consumer Feedback, and Internal Audit. CHO has developed additional management measures for the bottling facility and refinery plant as well as the soap processing facility to address additionally identified impacts as noted above in the Identification of Risks and Impacts Section. These include an Environmental Management System for the bottling facility and refinery plant as well as a stand-alone HACCP Plan and Manual (created in September 2014), which lists preventive measures specifically for managing food safety risk at the bottling facility.
CHO also has in place a Suppliers Evaluation Survey to assess on an annual basis quality, quantity, timeliness of delivery, and compliance with food safety requirements. This includes questions related to the suppliers system for managing environmental risks as well as on traceability.
As part of the ESAP, CHO shall ensure full implementation of the tasks as identified for each site in the EIA Environmental Management Plans and operations safety Improvement Plans as well as those stipulated in various certification schemes (ISO 14001, ISO 9001, ISO 22000, BRC Global Standard for Food Safety, IFS Food, and IFS HPC, certificates for the organic production of olive oil and soap),any additional aspects as contemplated under the principles of IFCs Performance Standards (for example, as related to CHOs supply chain and stakeholder engagement), and on a continual basis, develop the necessary management programs for addressing new risks and impacts as these are identified during the implementation of CHOs framework for managing the environmental and social aspects across all CHO sites. CHO shall identify potential gaps in existing management measures, such as Standard Operating Procedures that describe the measures and actions taken by CHO, in relation to the environmental and social risks identified. CHO shall present to IFC a consolidated plan reflecting a timetable for development and implementation of Standard Operating Procedures, including designated responsibilities and budgetary allocations, if necessary, for all sites. CHO shall also develop a Supplier Code of Conduct to apply to its primary suppliers of olives and pressed olive oil, which should operate in compliance with Tunisian legal and regulatory requirements as well as ensure workplace safety at milling operations (see Supply Chain section below).
Organizational Capacity and Competency. CHO has established an organizational structure that defines roles, responsibilities and the necessary authority for implementing CHOs EHSQ risk management system across all operations. To this end, CHO has designated three employees to perform the function of Quality Manager, Environmental Manager, and OHS and Security Manager at the CHO group level; their job responsibilities are described in a Company procedure and they report as a working group on EHSQ issues on a regular basis to the CEO. The CEO approves all policies and procedures as well as requested budget allocations related to the EHSQ aspects of Company operations. Furthermore, the Quality Manager participates in meetings of the Board of Directors and provides input on budget allocation and financial planning related to EHSQ risk management across Company operations.
At the individual site level, Plant Managers are accountable for the implementation of the annual improvement plan, which also includes EHSQ action areas; 1-2 staff at these plants are responsible for the day-to-day implementation of these actions and report to the Quality Manager, Environmental Manager, and OHS and Security Manager at the CHO group level. During IFCs site visit and based on discussions with key individuals at individual sites, staff were generally found to be competent and knowledgeable of plant operations.
As part of the onboarding for all new employees, CHO provides an overview of the Companys commitment and approach to managing EHSQ issues across its operations. Production supervisors provide feedback on the need for refresher training as they observe recurring non-compliances by employees. As new procedures are introduced, the Quality, Environmental, and OHS and Security managers identify the need for awareness training and communicate this to relevant key staff. Training is coordinated through the Human Resources unit, which maintains an annual training plan and records of attendees.
As part of the ESAP, CHO shall update the description of responsibilities document in terms of EHSQ issues to include Plant Managers and site level staff. Upon completion of additional Standard Operating Procedures to address all the environmental and social risks identified across operations, CHO shall develop a comprehensive training plan to ensure effective implementation of the Companys Integrated Management Manual and to be updated periodically and as required, based on management review reflecting satisfactory management of material risks and impacts across Company operations.
Emergency Preparedness and Response. As required under National Law for obtaining a certificate demonstrating operations safety, CHO completed a risk hazard assessment of potential incidents such as a fire, explosion or pollution/spill at each facility, for which scenarios are described ranked by likelihood of occurrence and identified by location within the facility. To date, CHO has developed an Internal Operations Procedure for three out of the five sites and is in the process of developing one for the remaining two sites, summarizing the key risks and specifying procedures for addressing these risks, including evacuation plan, roles and responsibilities including the local fire brigade and other relevant authorities, record-keeping as well as training. As required under National Law, the risk hazard assessment is to be undertaken every two years (the next one is due to be completed by the end of 2015). All sites were equipped with the necessary fire prevention system, including alarms, a combination of fire extinguishers, and hydrant/hose/dedicated water reservoir in accordance with Tunisian standards. CHO undertakes regular inspections of the fire extinguishers and with assistance from an external contractor and the local fire brigade, emergency training once per year.
As part of the ESAP, CHO shall formalize into written Standard Operating Procedures the regular inspection and verification of the integrity of the fire prevention system at all sites.
Monitoring and Review. CHO has established procedures for monitoring EHSQ aspects of operations as required under Tunisian law and the various certifications that currently apply to its operations: ISO 14001 at the bottling facility and refinery plant; ISO 22000, BRC, and IFS Food at the bottling facility; and IFS certification for the manufacturing of cosmetics at the soap processing facility. This includes a clearly defined plan for regular monitoring of all sites, which entails: inspection of hygiene conditions of all sites and employees at every critical control point as well as overall conditions of the buildings and equipment at least once per week. CHO has also defined reduction targets such as reducing energy and water consumption by 2% at the refinery and product waste as defined by input (packaging and product)/output (finished goods) ratios at the bottling facility to exceed 90%.
The EHSQ working group meets with management on a monthly basis at a minimum throughout the year to discuss EHSQ issues on an on-going basis. A comprehensive EHSQ report, reflecting issues such as progress made with respect to implementation of the integrated management system across sites and indicator performance, is prepared at least once a year and shared with management. In cases of regulatory non-compliance, CHO reports to the relevant Tunisian authorities.
As part of the ESAP, CHO shall develop additional monitoring procedures that are implemented with those already in place, to assess the effectiveness of the management plans that are already implemented or pending development across all its operations. To this end, CHO shall define a comprehensive set of corporate EHSQ indicators to record performance and track changes on a monthly/annual basis, including: i) energy and water consumption and efficiency; ii) air emissions (NOx, SOx, particulates, and hexane), including GHG emissions; iii) noise levels and management; iv) solid and hazardous waste management and disposal; v) wastewater volume; vi) compliance with national OHS requirements, including accident rates (lost-time accidents and accident free days); and vii) customer and community complaints. CHO shall use this data to assess progress made toward achieving targets for improvement and, as necessary, identify the need for revising the management plans already in place to demonstrate continuous improvement in EHSQ performance, productivity and resource efficiency (water and energy) across its operations. CHO shall integrate this information into the existing EHSQ reporting process such that senior management can ensure the on-going effectiveness of its environmental and social risk management framework in meeting the commitments as set out in CHOs overarching ESHQ policy.
Stakeholder Engagement. CHO has developed an External Communication Plan, which identifies the Companys stakeholders (clients, suppliers, contractors, regulatory and government agencies, and certification organizations), the designated point of contact within the Company, how and the frequency with which to engage, and the purpose for engaging. CHO holds almost weekly meetings with the mayor of Sfax. Considering the risks and impacts of CHO operations, this level of stakeholder engagement can be considered to be appropriate. However, CHO needs to formalize its current approach and develop a Stakeholder Engagement Plan to ensure on-going strong and responsive relationships with all stakeholders.
As part of the ESAP, CHO shall develop a Stakeholder Engagement Plan to include identification and analysis of all stakeholders, determination of their level of interest and influence (by importance and relevance) in CHO, establishment of appropriate methods for engaging each group (see section on External Communications) including a grievance mechanism and responding in a timely manner, and designation of a point of contact at each operational site.
External Communications. CHO has developed an External Communication Plan (see section on Stakeholder Engagement) to receive feedback from clients (both buyers and end-consumers), review supplier performance, retain the services of contractors, assess changes in regulatory requirements, and remain updated on certification requirements as well as request technical assistance, if needed. CHO has implemented a software system to track feedback from clients based in France and the respective account managers are responsible for overseeing the necessary follow up.
As part of the ESAP, CHO shall: i) revise the External Communication Plan to ensure that it is comprehensive (to include surrounding communities) and applies across all its operations; ii) inform all stakeholder groups on the available communication channels for providing feedback to CHO; iii) implement a tracking system for receiving and registering all feedback received; and iv) assign responsibilities for screening and assessing issues raised and how to address them.