PS 5 Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement is not applicable to this project as land acquisition is proceeding on a purely voluntary basis with no possibility for expropriation. Land acquisition arrangements are described above in the project description section. PS 7 is not applicable as no Indigenous Peoples have been identified in the project area                                                 

  This is a Category A project per IFC’s Policy on Environmental and Social Sustainability. Social risks and impacts are expected to be low as there are no residences within or immediately adjacent to the site and agricultural use is limited by the rocky, hilly terrain. Biodiversity-related risks are significant: as described in the project description, this project forms part of a cluster of existing and planned wind power projects located east of Dana Biosphere Reserve, a nationally legally protected and a UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Reserve (MAB). The Dana Biosphere Reserve is located within a Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) as recognized by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), and an Important Bird and Biodiversity Area (IBA) as recognized by BirdLife International due to the diverse assemblage of breeding birds of unusually mixed bio-geographical conditions present in the area.

Both the Reserve and IBA/KBA are located to the west of the project site, in the Rift Valley/Red Sea flyway for migratory birds, the second most frequented flyway worldwide. The IBA is also known to support resident or summer breeding raptors and other threatened bird species in Jordan. The IBA is the only place in Jordan where Griffon Vulture breeding sites are found and is a key breeding area for Syrian Serin, a restricted-range species. As such, the key E&S issue for this project concerns the avoidance, monitoring and management of potential adverse impacts (including cumulative impacts) on birds, and in particular on those priority bird species at the highest risk from wind farm related impacts, as established in the Tafila Region Wind Power Cumulative Effects Assessment.                                       

IFC’s appraisal considered the environmental and social management planning process and documentation for the project and gaps, if any, between these and IFC’s requirements. Where necessary, corrective measures, intended to close these gaps within a reasonable period of time, are summarized in the paragraphs that follow and (if applicable) in an agreed Environmental and Social Action Plan (ESAP). Through the implementation of these measures, the project is expected to be designed and operated in accordance with Performance Standards objectives                                             

 An ESIA, ESMP, Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) and Non-Technical Summary (all dated July 2017) have been prepared for this project by Germany-based Cube Engineering and Jordanian-based EcoConsult, in line with Jordanian and IFC requirements. Key aspects covered by the ESIA documentation include noise, shadow flicker, cultural heritage / archaeology, biodiversity, traffic impacts, water and air quality impacts, occupational health & safety (OHS) and visual impacts. The ESIA is in final draft format (late July 2017) and is considered fit-for-purpose in relation to IFC requirements following exchanges and updates made during the appraisal process. Any changes requested by Jordan’s Ministry of Environment will be incorporated into the ESIA and ESMP and the final version will be added to this disclosure once available (expected to be September 2017). Key issues, mitigation and monitoring measures outlined in this ESRS have been included in the ESMP and stakeholder engagement measures are captured in the SEP. Cumulative impacts from the multiple existing and planned WPPs in the Tafila area have been assessed in a Cumulative Effects Assessment (CEA, also disclosed with this ESRS) report commissioned by IFC, key recommendations of which have been incorporated into the ESMP.

The project ESMP outlines all key mitigation measures identified via the ESIA and CEA processes that the company will implement during the project construction and operations phases to meet Jordanian and IFC E&S requirements. Vestas, the turbine supplier, EPC and O&M contractor, will be contractually bound to implement those portions of the ESMP that fall within its scope of work.

Construction and operations phase E&S management and monitoring responsibilities will be shared between the Sponsors and Vestas, which is an ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 certified company and is involved in development of the nearby Tafila Wind (operational) and Xenel Wind (pre-financial close) projects. The company will retain an experienced Owner’s Engineer to oversee the necessary site works and will either hire an Environmental, Health & Safety (EHS) Officer to oversee ESMP implementation, or require the owner’s engineer to do so on its behalf. Day-to-day construction phase E&S management will be handled by an EHS Officer employed by Vestas (ESAP item 1). Other ESMP measures, for example detailed post-construction bird monitoring surveys and periodic E&S monitoring during construction and operations, will be the responsibility of the company, which will commission one or more suitably experienced E&S consultancies to perform the necessary actions, as described under PS 6 below.

Construction workers will receive training on EHS matters, in particular OHS awareness, use of appropriate personal protective equipment, site rules concerning housekeeping matters such as waste management and traffic / driving safety, and written instructions / maps on which areas of the site to avoid due to the presence of archaeological artefacts and possible bird nests (ESAP item 2). This training will be delivered by Vestas and supplemented as necessary by the client’s EHS Officer. Specialized training for bird observers, staff members involved in operations phase curtailment monitoring (see PS 6 section for further discussion) and post-construction bird carcass searches, will be delivered by an experienced Jordanian ornithologist(s). Operations and maintenance (O&M) work will be conducted largely by highly trained Vestas technicians who receive specialized OHS training off site.

The ESMP contains a series of E&S monitoring commitments for the project, such as constructions phase OHS performance, operations phase noise, shadow flicker, bird mortality and turbine curtailment monitoring. Vestas will keep records of OHS performance during the construction period. The client will summarize biodiversity monitoring outcomes (described under PS 6 below) as well as the results of its other E&S monitoring programs and will share the results with the relevant authorities and lenders on a biannual basis. As per the recommendations of the CEA study, any significant mortality events involving priority bird species will be highlighted to lenders and authorities (including the conservation NGO acting for the authorities on ornithological matters) and will be subject to follow-on measures to avoid a repeat. Monitoring of EHS impacts during construction will be on a quarterly basis, whilst monitoring of priority birds, to enable selective curtailment, will be conducted on an ongoing basis during operations                                                  

  The project is expected to employ around 70 workers during peak construction, around 30 % of whom are likely to be locally based unskilled workers. Once operations commence, the company and Vestas will maintain a limited staff presence (not more than 10 persons) on site to operate the windfarm, in addition to unarmed security guards. In addition, trained bird observers will be retained on site, either by the company or by a consultancy retained by the company, to implement agreed biodiversity-related mitigation measures, as described further under PS 6 below. No worker accommodation camp will be constructed.

The company will ensure that Vestas provide all workers – including sub-contractor workers – with written documentation concerning the terms and conditions of their employment, including their rights under Jordanian labor regulations, e.g. in relation to hours of work, wages, overtime compensation and so forth, as per IFC PS 2 requirements (ESAP item 3). It is unlikely that workers’ unions will be involved in the project as the main concentration of workers will be on site during a short-lived construction period only; as noted above, the operations staff will be small. Nonetheless, the company will not in any way prevent workers from seeking to join unions or other workers’ organizations. As per ESAP item 3, the company will ensure that a worker grievance mechanism is established, either by the company or Vestas, to ensure that workers (including all contractors and sub-contractors) can raise any grievances and have these systematically recorded, tracked and addressed.

The company will make employment decisions based on equal opportunity and fair treatment, and in accordance with Jordanian regulations on non-discrimination. No child or forced labor will be used by the project at any time. Proof of identification and age will be required at the time of employment.

The company and Vestas will ensure that all workers are issued with appropriate personal protective equipment, that workers are adequately trained to identify and manage the OHS risks specific to their tasks, and that they are overseen by suitably qualified site and project supervisors. Vestas will prepare a site-specific OHS plan for the project and the company’s Owner’s Engineer will ensure that OHS, amongst other matters, is given sufficient attention during the construction process. OHS performance will be recorded by Vestas and shared with the company, Lenders and the Jordanian authorities. Operations and maintenance work will generally be undertaken by trained Vestas technicians familiar with the turbines, tasks and specific OHS risks involved with windfarm operation and upkeep. Vestas will make use of safety manuals specifically developed for the turbines to be used by the project when conducting routine O&M tasks                                                 

   Greenhouse gases: The project is expected to generate 153 GWh of energy per annum. Jordan’s current carbon dioxide emission performance is 0.64 kg carbon dioxide per kilowatt hour, per recent International Energy Statistics. As such, it is expected to avoid 112,000 tons of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel usage in Jordan per year and contribute to the country’s renewable energy development program.

Noise, visual and shadow flicker impact assessments were conducted as part of the project ESIA. Noise modelling shows that operational turbine noise levels will remain within Jordanian and World Bank Group noise thresholds at the nearest sensitive receptors located around 1 km west of the nearest turbines. This follows a micro-siting process where several turbine locations were shifted eastward to avoid potential noise exceedances, based on modeling undertaken during the ESIA. This turbine site adjustment process also fulfils Jordanian permitting requirements for the site which require a buffer of 1 km to be maintained between wind turbines and the nearest residential receptor(s). Shadow flicker effects modeled during the ESIA indicated that several exceedances of the WBG Guidelines threshold limits of 30 mins / day or 30 days / year (worst case) could be expected in the morning hours at certain homes located to the west of the wind farm. Thus, shadow flicker curtailment units will be fitted to several turbines, causing them to switch off during the predicted exceedance periods (which can be determined precisely). Visual impacts of the project were found not to be significant, based on the visual impact assessment component of the ESIA. The turbines will be barely visible from the Dana Nature Reserve, the most sensitive area with respect to tourism, located around 7.5 km from site and mostly shielded by topography.

Vestas will be responsible for implementing erosion control measures on site during project construction. Water requirements will be low during windfarm construction (5 m3/day) and operation (0.5 m3/day); the project will obtain water from the town water supply in Tafila, which is located around 6 km from the site. Analysis provided in the ESIA indicates that these levels of water abstraction from the Tafila supply system will have negligible impact on the system/other users. Water use intensity will be considerably lower than for an equivalent capacity thermal power plant, which would require cooling water: this is a positive factor for wind power in an arid country such as Jordan. Vestas will be required to produce a waste management plan prior to the commencement of construction incorporating designated waste storage areas, procedures for the responsible management of solid and liquid wastes and spill prevention measures for fuel and hazardous substances. Waste will be disposed of at a licensed municipal landfill by a certified contractor                                                

 As the area surrounding the site is sparsely populated and there will be no workers’ accommodation camp, community health and safety risks are fairly limited and mainly associated with the construction phase. The main road traffic risk associated with the project is associated with transport of the turbines, blades and wind tower components to site from Aqaba Port. A road transport survey covering the route and any necessary modifications required to get the abnormal loads to site safely and on time has been commissioned. Material transfers will almost certainly take place overnight to avoid traffic blockages and unsafe road conditions and minimize risks to residents of roadside villages.

Vestas will prepare emergency preparedness and response and construction traffic safety plans prior to the commencement of construction, as per ESAP item 4.

Security risks are low in the project area. During construction, the EPC contractor will sub-contract a small unarmed private security team to restrict site access. Vestas’ EHS Officer will ensure that the construction-related mitigation measures in the ESMP will be implemented to minimize health and safety risks to the surrounding communities, for example by fencing and restricting access to the substation area, patrolling the site, establishing clear signals in hazardous construction areas, placing of warning tape around dangerous areas and securing of areas where hazardous activities are performed. Security personnel will be trained to minimize potential conflicts with local landowners / land users and other representatives of project affected communities                                              

    Jordan is located along one of the most important migration flyways in the world, namely the Rift Valley / Red Sea Flyway. Millions of migratory soaring birds fly along this flyway biannually from north to south in autumn and in the opposite direction during the spring season when the birds will be heading to their breeding grounds. The eastern edge of the Great Rift Valley lies approximately 6 km to the west of the project site. As noted in the project description, the project site is located around 7.5 km northeast of the Dana Biosphere Reserve, an important stopover point for migratory birds, and around 3 km northeast of the outer eastern edge of the Dana IBA, which engulfs the Reserve and which is also an important bird breeding area.

The project site itself consists of rocky hills with sparse vegetation cover. Local habitat has been modified by scattered wheat cultivation and fencing associated with low-level grazing activities, as well as the construction of roads and temporary agricultural shelters.  Given its location however near the Rift Valley margins, it is still potentially sensitive, particularly with respect to birds. Bird baseline surveys have covered three migration seasons – i.e. spring and autumn periods - over the course of two consecutive years (2014 and 2015). The most recent of these (2015) formed part of the IFC-commissioned CEA described above under PS 1. The studies focused on migratory soaring bird species, and resident / summer breeding raptors. Vantage point surveys were conducted to collect these monitoring data, using three vantage points. Surveys were based on methodologies developed by Scottish Natural Heritage adapted to allow migratory bird activity along the Rift Valley / Red Sea flyway to be adequately characterized. Such surveys quantify flight activity that takes place within the wind farm envelope, with the primary objective of determining the likely collision risk of at-risk bird species. In addition to flight activity vantage point surveys, a breeding bird survey was conducted from March-May 2016.

The baseline bird survey results for the project ESIA indicate that of the 13 priority bird populations identified by the CEA, four migratory soaring raptor species (Egyptian Vulture - Endangered , Steppe Eagle – Endangered, Eastern Imperial Eagle - Vulnerable, Booted Eagle – Least Concern), and five summer breeding/resident raptors (Short-toed Snake-Eagle – Vulnerable, Griffon Vulture – Endangered, Golden Eagle – Endangered, Long-legged Buzzard – Least Concern and Lesser Kestrel – Near Threatened) have been recorded in flight over the project site. Two priority breeding/resident raptors were not recorded (Verreaux’s Eagle and Bonelli’s Eagle). The two remaining non-raptor resident priority bird populations (Syrian Serin - Endangered and European Goldfinch – Endangered) were not reported during vantage point surveys, and not recorded during the 2016 breeding bird survey.

Bat surveys undertaken on site in 2014 and 2016 recorded three species (all regionally Least Concern), and neither of the two priority bat species (Desert Pipistrelle Hypsugo ariel and Rüppell’s Pipistrelle Pipistrellus rueppelli) identified by the CEA; Additionally, terrestrial fauna surveys recorded Blasius’s Horseshoe Bat Rhinolophus blasii – Near Threatened near the study area. Bat mortality will be assessed as part of the post-construction monitoring program.

Flora and terrestrial fauna surveys conducted during spring 2014 and 2016 recorded three nationally threatened plant species (Eminium spiculatum - Vulnerable, Coilchicum ritchii – Endangered, and Cousinia moabitica – Vulnerable), and one globally threatened reptile (Spur-thighed tortoise Testudo graeca – Vulnerable), within the project site. Additionally one regionally threatened mammal species (Striped Hyena Hyaena hyaena – Vulnerable) was recorded in the vicinity of the project site. With respect to threatened flora, the project will conduct a pre-construction survey to identify the locations of any of the three nationally threatened plant species found during baseline surveys (ESAP item 5). Surveys will be conducted by a qualified ecologist/botanist familiar with the local flora during the flowering season for each species. To avoid damage during the construction phase, localized populations of Coilchicum ritchii and Eminium spiculatum identified in the central and southern part of the site will be marked/fenced and if necessary relocated. Populations of Cousinia moabitica will also be marked/fenced. Any fencing will allow for movement of small fauna species through the area.

With respect to threatened terrestrial fauna the project will conduct a pre-construction survey to identify the presence of any active tortoises as well as potential hibernation/aestivation sites (during summer and winter) within all assigned areas to be disturbed by construction. Any tortoises at risk will be relocated, supervised by a qualified ecologist familiar with the species, to areas with similar habitat characteristics, outside active construction areas.

Although the project site itself is largely modified habitat, given its proximity to the Dana Biosphere Reserve and the Dana IBA and the assemblages of bird activity associated with the air space above it, IFC’s requirements for Natural Habitat will apply.  The most significant potential biodiversity risk associated with this project (and other WPPs planned in the vicinity) concerns birds. The collision rate estimates produced for the spring 2015 vantage point surveys suggest a low level of risk of less than one bird per year for each of the priority raptor populations. Analysis of collision data for the wind energy projects included in the CEA indicate overall a low level of risk for migratory soaring birds and a higher risk for breeding / resident raptors.   Evidence from baseline vantage point bird surveys indicate that the project site is not located within a migration bottleneck and birds typically migrate along a ‘broad-front’ as they pass over the site.  Regarding small passerine species, they are not considered to be at risk from collision as they do not have behavioral traits that put them at risk.

To avoid negative impacts on breeding bird populations, a breeding bird survey will be carried out before construction (ESAP item 6). If active breeding attempts of CEA priority birds or any other IUCN globally or regionally threatened species are confirmed, construction activities that could affect their breeding success (including soil and vegetation stripping) will be delayed until these have either failed or young birds have fledged. Further annual breeding surveys initially for two subsequent years will be carried out if these categories of species are recorded using the site during the pre-construction phase, to inform an adaptive management approach to operational phase activities.

With respect to operations, in line with CEA recommendations and per ESAP item 7, the company will conduct in-flight activity monitoring incorporating an observer-led shutdown on demand procedure to safeguard migratory soaring birds and priority resident / summer breeding raptor bird populations from collision with turbine rotors. Observer-led shutdown on demand is an established method involving a coordinated team of trained bird observers identifying situations in which priority bird species are at risk of colliding with turbines and initiating a temporary shutdown (i.e. selective curtailment) of one or more turbines. Typically, shutdown requests are made by members of the field team or the field team coordinator to the wind farm operator using a communication device such as a mobile phone or two-way radio. Monitoring will be conducted for an initial 3-year period from two strategically located vantage points that collectively allow bird observers to view the whole project site for bird flight activity. Monitoring will be conducted during daylight hours, 7-days per week, for a minimum of 8hrs per day, throughout the year with different monitoring priorities for the spring and autumn migration compared to the non-migration periods. During the migration periods a single bird observer will be located at each of two vantage points and daily monitoring will be targeted to cover peak migration activity periods. Ideally, rest breaks will be taken during periods of low priority bird activity. During the non-migratory period daily monitoring will be targeted at peak activity periods of locally breeding/wintering priority species. 

Carcass search surveys will be conducted for all bird and bat fatalities at all fifteen turbine locations, as per ESAP item 8. Bias correction experiments to calibrate these searches will also be undertaken. Livestock movements within the site will be monitored and recorded as part of the operations phase bird monitoring program to help identify elevated risks to Griffon Vulture and other scavenging bird species that may be attracted to the site by the periodic presence of livestock on site. Operations phase in-flight monitoring and carcass search surveys will be required for the first 3 years of windfarm operation. A decision as to the scope and timing of monitoring thereafter will be made in consultation with lenders and authorities based on monitoring outcomes and adaptive management. A similar approach to mitigating bird and bat-related risks has been adopted for IFC’s investment at Tafila WPP, 3.5 km from the project site. No collision fatalities involving priority bird species have been recorded at Tafila WPP in the first 22 months of operations to July 2017.

The approach above is proposed to achieve no net loss of priority species.  To facilitate an adaptive management response to bird and bat fatalities and emergent risks to birds and bats at the project site, the company will report priority bird and bat fatalities to authorities and lenders in a timely manner (expected to be within 3-5 working days). In the event of a fatality of a priority species, a review of the incident will be conducted by the responsible expert ornithologist.  The company will also provide bi-annual reports to IFC detailing results of in-flight monitoring (including ‘elevated risk situations’), shutdown on demand incidents (including ‘near-misses’), carcass search surveys and trials to calibrate these surveys (ESAP item 9). The CEA recommends that an ‘internal committee’ be established once at least two wind energy projects involved in the CEA become operational. In addition to the lenders, this internal committee, comprising representatives of participating wind power projects along with competent developer-contracted ornithological specialists and/or external specialists, will review all reporting relating to operational monitoring and mitigation. As per ESAP item 10, the client will participate in the establishment and operation of such a committee once the KOSPO Energy project nears the operational phase.

Before the start of the operational phase, the company will produce detailed protocols for monitoring and mitigation activities to be conducted at the project site, as per ESAP item 11. Protocols will be required for (i) in-flight monitoring and observer-led shutdown on demand; (ii) carcass search surveys; and (iii) bias correction trials for carcass search surveys.

As per ESAP item 12, the company will ensure that all bird monitoring and mitigation protocols are developed and produced by an experienced ornithological consultant; in-flight monitoring and shutdown on demand will be conducted by experienced ornithologists with field experience and knowledge of birds likely to be encountered on surveys; the responsibility for overseeing, managing, and reporting of bird monitoring and mitigation activities will be assigned to a consultancy with relevant ornithological expertise. Carcass search survey personnel do not need to be trained ornithologists but will receive training in field and recording techniques associated with carcass search surveys from an experienced ornithologist who will oversee and manage surveys and analyze and report the results of these surveys.  The company and lenders will agree on the profile and experience of all teams engaged in ornithological work prior to commencement                                                

                    NA                               

  A field-based archaeological study covering the entire site was conducted in April – May 2016 by the Department of Antiquities (DoA), the governmental agency in Jordan responsible for the protection of cultural heritage. DoA identified ten sites within the project footprint and a further five sites near the site boundary. These sites involve features such as caverns, structures and architectural elements which date back to the Nabatean, Roman, Edom and Second Iron Ages. Nine of the ten sites are relatively small. Although similar sites are commonly found in the surrounding mountains, DoA regards these sites as worth of protection and approved the project based on an agreement to keep a 70 m buffer between project infrastructure and activities and each of the ten identified sites within the project boundary. Furthermore, the company will share the map of these sites with Vestas to ensure that they are not disturbed, and Vestas will include related guidance in the worker induction training module. Vestas will also develop and implement a Chance Finds Procedure in case of any unexpected finds during project construction; if any such finds occur, the company will notify DoA immediately                                                 

   The closest communities to the wind farm include (i) Um Sarab and Bseira which are located at distances of 1 and 3 km from the western site boundary, respectively; (ii) Gharandal, located 1.3 km to the south, and (iii) Ain Baida, located 4 km north west of the site. No local households have been identified as living within the site boundaries or within a kilometer of any turbine. Key project stakeholders identified to date include affected landowners, with whom long-term lease agreements have been, or will be, signed; land users of parcels that will not be directly impacted but fall within the general construction area; relevant national and local authorities; power transmission company NEPCO; Jordanian bird experts and NGOs. Potentially vulnerable groups identified included women and Bedouin nomads.

The client has developed a Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP, disclosed with this ESRS) which identifies these key stakeholders and describes how project information has been and will be disclosed and discussed with them as part of the ESIA and permitting process, and what consultation processes will be maintained.

Stakeholder engagement has occurred into two main phases, in keeping with ESIA methodology, namely the scoping phase and the detailed studies phase. The first public consultation event that took place for this project was the ESIA scoping meeting, organized by Jordan’s Ministry of Environment in Amman on March 24, 2016. This was attended mainly by representatives of bird life NGOs and multiple relevant authorities. Follow up meetings were held with local community members, affected landowners, local authorities and nomadic Bedouin representatives in May and July 2016. For example, a meeting focused on the local municipality and local community members was held in Bseira Village on May 23, 2016. Several follow-up meetings were held on the project site thereafter, involving landowners, users and Bedouin. Thereafter, multiple meetings were held with local stakeholders between July 2016 and April 2017 as part of the detailed studies for the final ESIA.

Key issues raised by stakeholders have included employment opportunities, air quality, noise, health and safety, land leasing arrangements and rates, and possible impacts on birds. The ESIA has a section dedicated to potential impacts on Bedouin nomads and associated consultations. Two Bedouin groupings have been identified as using the general area from April through September each year, primarily for livestock grazing purposes. As only 1.4 % of the project site area is required for wind farm components, much of the land is government owned and open to use by anyone, and as Bedouin families do not establish temporary camps in any fixed location (i.e. they can readily avoid project infrastructure or temporary construction disturbances), the ESIA indicates that impacts on this potentially vulnerable group are expected to be negligible.

Substantial stakeholder engagement on the issue of potential bird impacts was undertaken in the course of the IFC-led Cumulative Effects Assessment for the Tafila area, which was published in early 2017 and which reflects around two years’ worth of stakeholder engagement on this issue. Key outcomes of this assessment have been factored into the mitigation plan for this project, as discussed under the PS 6 section above and in the attached ESAP.

The SEP indicates how the project will continue to interact with local communities and other stakeholders on an ongoing basis, especially in the run-up to the start of the construction phase. It also contains a community grievance mechanism which will be implemented by the client and EPC contractor during construction, and by the client and O&M contractor during operations, and provides contact details for the company’s community liaison personnel. The sponsors have donated a series of solar power systems to recipient institutions in Tafila to date - for example a 30 kW system for Tafila Technical University, an 8 kW system for Tafila Sports Club and an 8 kW system for the Tafila Disabled Children’s School – in addition to food donations made during Ramadan 2017. Further community investment activities are planned, which will entail related stakeholder engagement activities. The ESIA has recommended that future such investments are carefully planned and consulted on as part of a concerted engagement strategy with local communities and other key stakeholders during the lead-up to the construction process: this matter is currently under consideration by the project sponsors                                                

    Contact Person: Mr. Taeyong Lee, General Manager

Company Name:  DAEHAN Wind Power PSC Co.

Address: P.O. Box 3627, Amman 11821, Jordan

Email: nadorose2@naver.com

Phone: +962  6 581 8650