PROJECT

Projects

Environmental & Social Review Summary

Project Number

35174

Company Name

MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED

Date ESRS Disclosed

Aug 6, 2014

Country

World Region

Region

Global

Last Updated Date

Feb 27, 2022

Environmental Category

B - Limited

Status

Completed

Previous Events

Approved : Oct 14, 2014
Signed : Nov 24, 2014
Invested : Dec 2, 2014

Sector

Port and Harbor Operations

Industry

Infrastructure

Department

Infra-WBG Dir. Transport & Logis

Project Description

MSC, an existing IFC sponsor, is the world’s second largest container shipping company with 460 container vessels in operation at the end of June 2014. The company also owns material interests in 28 container terminals in 20 countries across 5 continents. IFC is considering a $150 million loan to MSC Cyprus - a wholly-owned MSC subsidiary responsible for the worldwide manning, technical servicing, and procurement of parts for MSC ships - to help improve the fuel efficiency of over 100 existing MSC vessels. This is expected to lead to significant GHG reductions for the MSC fleet. The necessary retrofitting works are expected to be performed in Chinese shipyards.

Overview of IFC's Scope of Review

IFC’s appraisal of this proposed investment involved review of Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. (MSC) corporate sustainability policies; a greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction estimate for the project; Health, Safety & Environment (HSE) management certifications for the Chinese shipyards that will undertake project-related vessel renovations; and an example of an MSC HSE audit of a shipyard. Telephone conversations were also held with MSC technical and HSE staff members.

IFC currently has three projects in supervision where MSC is acting as a sponsor: (i) Asyaport in Turkey (project 32902, disclosed April 23, 2013); (ii) Brasil Terminal Portuario in Brazil (project 29505, disclosed October 15, 2010); and (iii) Togo LCT in Togo (project 29197, disclosed November 2, 2010). IFC supervision of these projects indicates that HSE performance has generally been satisfactory to date.

IFC’s appraisal considered HSE issues and plans for the project, and gaps between these plans and IFC requirements. Corrective measures intended to close these gaps within a reasonable period of time are summarized below and in the agreed Environmental and Social Action Plan (ESAP) disclosed in this review summary. Through the implementation of these management plans the project is expected to be designed and operated in accordance with IFC Performance Standards (PS) objectives.

E & S Project Categorization and Applicable Standard

Environmental and Social Mitigation Measures

Stakeholder Engagement

Broad Community Support

Environmental & Social Action Plan