Ambient Conditions
The New Liberty Mine site is located approximately 40 km from the coast, in an area of gently undulating topography. The area is classified as comprising a mosaic of primary and secondary forest, with large areas of swamp vegetation. All the forest areas around New Liberty have been subjected to some encroachment. Elevation at the site ranges from 50 meters above sea level in the south, gradually rising via rolling topography to 80 meters above sea level in the north. The project area has a tropical climate with wet and dry seasons with an annual average rainfall of approximately 3,500 mm per year.
Key issues to address during the various phases of the project include surface and ground water management, pollution prevention (air and water), cyanide and arsenic management (see water resources section below), non-hazardous and hazardous waste management, potential impacts on biodiversity in the areas of influence (see PS6), and occupational health and safety.
Air Quality
Dust is considered a potential impact from project activities, especially related to traffic along the route of the mine. It is expected that fugitive dust will be generated mostly during the dry season although the heavy rainfall (~3.5 meters per year) and short dry season in the area of New Liberty will reduce this risk. During dry periods, the Company has included several mitigation measures within its environmental management plan including the use water trucks to limit the generation of dust, established speed limits and the need for adequate maintenance of the roads. Also, surface treatment materials (such as polymers) could be used if required. Monitoring of the impacts of dust in the community is already taking place and the information from this monitoring program will guide any subsequent dust management measures if they are found not to be working satisfactorily.
The New Liberty mine will operate diesel generators with a capacity of 9 MW (with an average operational demand of 5.5 MW). Gaseous emissions (eg: NOx) are being monitored using Radiello Passive/diffusive samplers and will be compared to baseline conditions to enable any impacts on sensitive receptors to be mitigated. The nearest receptors are Camp David which is 1.5 km away from the plant site and the next nearest around 2.5 km away, with a large area of thick forest between this.
Impact is estimated to be limited to the plant and power generation plant area and can be readily mitigated with regular generator maintenance and tuning of the combustion equipment and reduction of engine idling/start-up times. Any worker exposure to emissions will be monitored as part of normal OH&S procedures.
Monitoring of dust is currently being carried out at six sensitive receptor locations which is providing monthly, seasonal, and inter-annual data. A site meteorological station has also been recently installed to generate site specific data (wind speed, wind di
rection, rainfall, temperature, relative humidity, and pressure) to assist in the future assessment of pollutant suspension and subsequent transport from the source. The monitoring program will assist the company in assessing any potential impacts on these receptors and to put in place the necessary mitigation measures to address any impacts.
Water Resources
The Company has developed a comprehensive Water Management Plan for the New Liberty Project to consolidate and compile the data obtained to date including baseline information, water balances and climatic information and to develop a robust monitoring program to assess water quality and quantity for the project. This Plan includes specific requirements for monitoring and reporting of surface and ground water, on a quarterly basis, to assess potential changes in water quality and quantity during the life of the mine.
Although the ore body contains naturally occurring arsenic, ground and surface water sampling has shown average arsenic levels to be well below the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended limit for potable water (0.01 mg/l). Two samples of surface water only reflected arsenic levels slightly elevated above this limit.
Based on geochemical analysis of waste rock as part of the ESIA process, it has been determined that the waste rock is non-acid generating with ARD potential being low due to the Sulphur content being less than 0.02%. As part of this geochemical assessment, the Company carried out both static and kinetic testing of representative waste rock samples (60 samples for static and 1 combined sample for kinetic testing). Kinetic tests were initially run for 26 weeks and showed that there was a steadily declining level of metals in solution. Arsenic is present in the ore body with the kinetic testing showed a steadily declining level of arsenic in solution. At all times the arsenic concentration was below the discharge levels recommended in the WBG EHS Guidelines for Mining. The results further indicated that the waste rock’s acid neutralizing capacity is greater than its ability to generate acid, confirming the low potential for acid rock drainage
Water for construction is being obtained from boreholes, for the operational phase, recycling of water from the TSF will be maximized with make-up water as required being obtained from the Marvoe Creek diversion dam. All water abstraction will be in accordance with Liberian national regulations.
According to the Marvoe Creek Diversion, Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics Design Report (Epoch Resources), the diversion system will have two flood control dams / reservoirs, referred to as “Dam 1” and “Dam 2”. “Dam 1” will be constructed in the Marvoe Creek and “Dam 2”, will be constructed in a tributary of the creek. A trench will be cut between the two dams to ensure “Dam 1” overflows into “Dam 2”.
The proposed dams have a total storage capacity of approximately 11 million cubic meters, of which 7 million c
ubic meters is flood storage. The maximum wall height is anticipated to be 11 meters. The flood storage capacity relates to the temporal storage between full supply level (FSL) at 70.00 m.a.s.l. and non-overspill crest level (NOC) at 73.00 m.a.s.l.
Tailings Storage Facility (TSF)
The TSF has been designed by Epoch Resources, a South African based mine residue and environmental engineering consulting company. It is designed to be able to store a total of 9.35 million dry tonnes of tailings expected to be generated over a period of 8.5 years. The facility comprises combined initial valley containment and a self-raising paddock system. The geotechnical test work carried out to date indicates that settlement/consolidation of the tailings will be reached within 24 hours of deposition and hence, the facility lends itself to being developed using a self-raising paddocking system. The total footprint of the TSF is 120 hectares. The facility will also include a concrete encased penstock decant arrangement, with an emergency spillway; and a 2,000 m3 return water sump into which the decant water from the facility is discharged and returned to the plant or released.
The geotechnical investigations for this facility indicate that completely weathered rock is overlain by laterite in the higher ground, whilst the laterite is replaced by alluvium in the valley floors. From the test pit and borehole profiles, the alluvium or laterite extends to a depth of ±4.0mbgl. Below this depth, weathered rock (Gneiss) is encountered. Estimated permeability for the laterite is 1.6 x 10-7 – 4.0 x 10-8 meters per second. Estimated permeability for the weathered rock (Gneiss) is 1.0 x 10-6 – 1.0 x 10-7 meters per second. Risk Assessment of the facility design by a reputable independent engineering consultant and ICMC review with the intent of eventual certification is sufficient to give comfort that the level of risk to groundwater resources is acceptable.
In March 2014, SLR Consulting carried out an assessment for Aureus of the studies, investigation and design work for the TSF including the exposure pathways for arsenic and cyanide. This audit concluded that the overall design of the TSF is appropriate and the work to date is adequate, conforms to good practice and will enable ICMC certification in due course (after operational experience and plant process stability is achieved). The report further states that the fact that the TSF is unlined is deemed acceptable given the site specific characteristics, geochemical characteristics of the tailings and the proposed engineering mitigation measures. The report does provide several recommendations relating to the stability of the TSF, freeboard, pollution prevention design recommendations, etc, which are being incorporated into the final design of the facility (See ESAP Action 5). ICMC oversight provides additional confidence that the risks are being appropriately managed.
As part of IFC’s involvement th
e Company will appoint consultants (approved by IFC) to carry out regular and ongoing independent audits of the TSF every four months during construction (and every six months during operations) to ensure that design, construction and operation of this facility follows GIIP (See ESAP Action 6).
Arsenic Management
One of the key issues to address during operation of the mine is related to the management of naturally occurring arsenic in the ore body.
Following IFC’s guidance and request for further studies in order to meet IFC discharge guidelines, the Company has carried out several additional risk assessment studies to fully characterize arsenic behavior, including additional arsenic balances and modeling, taking into account specific geological, hydrogeological and climatic conditions and a comprehensive Arsenic Management Plan was developed.
The Arsenic Management Plan includes requirements for reducing soluble arsenic concentrations in the tailings stream within the process plant using Ferric Chloride to precipitate the arsenic. Drainage from the TSF will pass to an engineered wetland system downstream of the TSF to polish the discharge water to below the WBG EHS Guideline discharge level of 0.1 mg/l arsenic. In parallel, the Company has committed to develop a robust surface and ground water monitoring program to assure operational parameters of the TSF and the engineered wetland are met and concentrations of arsenic are monitored for compliance with IFC discharge standards (at the exit of the wetland for surface water and at surface and deep water boreholes immediately down gradient of the wetland system for ground water).
Cyanide Management
To ensure adherence to GIIP and IFC requirements, the Company has developed a Cyanide Management Plan which follows the principles of the ICMC for all stages of transport, storage, handling, use and disposal. The Company will sign up to the International Cyanide Management Code before IFC invests and will seek ICMC Certification for the Project by December 31, 2016 in order to ensure safety of cyanide management throughout its operations (see ESAP Action 7).
The Company will use the INCO SO2 process to reduce concentrations of cyanide in the tailings slurry pipeline leaving the process plant. The system is being designed such that discharge from the TSF will be acceptable to ICMC and maintained below the WBG EHS Guideline effluent discharge standard of 0.5 mg/L WAD Cyanide. The surface and ground water monitoring program will monitor concentrations of cyanide and ensure ICMC requirements are met, especially with respect to the removal of all hazardous exposure pathways.
All project infrastructure (such as the process plant, detoxification plant, tailings pipeline, TSF and associated facilities) will be designed to comply with the requirements of the ICMC. Prior to the transport and use of cyanide, the Cyanide Management Plan will be fully implemented to ensure all ICMC requ
irements are met.
Solid and Liquid Non-Hazardous and Hazardous Waste Management
For the management of hazardous and non-hazardous waste, the Company has adopted a waste management strategy - operationalized through a Hazardous and Non Hazardous Waste Management Plan - focused on prevention, minimization, reuse, if possible, recycling, and final disposal.
Liquid waste such as sewage will be managed through septic systems and the installation of a sewage treatment plant at the accommodation camp and the processing plant areas. Solid non-hazardous waste, which includes tins, cans, bottles, paper and cardboard, inert bulk waste, timber, piping and fittings, and scrap metals, among others, will be segregated for reuse or possible recycling. The Company will construct a landfill site at the New Liberty accommodation camp where non-hazardous waste will be compacted and backfilled after all potentially recyclable material has been removed. This site will be designed using internationally accepted standards for waste disposal. The general waste landfill site will be fenced and properly demarcated with proper signage boards. Disposal of waste in non-licensed landfills will be strictly prohibited.
Hazardous waste including waste oils and greases, oily rags, contaminated soils, dry cell batteries, waste from the assay laboratories, fluorescent light bulbs etc. will be delivered to an approved hazardous waste management facility or, if this does not exist within Liberia, the Company will make arrangements for appropriate long-term storage until appropriate mechanisms for their safe disposal can be identified.
Energy Use
It is envisaged that electrical power for the mine and processing infrastructure will be supplied by multiple diesel or heavy fuel oil generators, operating in parallel, with step up transformers to a reticulation voltage of 11 kV. The power plant will have an installed capacity of approximately 10MW. It is estimated that fuel consumption will be approximately 90 million liters of diesel during the 24 month construction phase and 11.5 million liters per year during the operations phase. It is expected that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the project during construction will be around 2,000 tonnes CO2 equivalent per year and during operations 83,000 tonnes CO2 equivalent per year. All emissions are from vehicles and the diesel power generators.
Emergency Preparedness and Response
As part of its ESHSMS, the Company has prepared an Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan (EPRP) in order to be able to respond appropriately to incidents and accidents during construction and operation of the mine. These include incidents and accidents related to fires and explosions, toxic releases, hydrocarbon spills, disease outbreaks and transportation accidents. This Plan includes specific information on responsibilities, emergency response actions, training and reporting requirements to manage these risks. All employ
ees of the Company together with DRA and other subcontractors will undergo training on the EPRP through camp inductions and periodic more specialized training on incident and accident scenarios and response.