PROJECT

Projects

Environmental & Social Review Summary

Project Number

34669

Company Name

SODA SANAYII ANONIM SIRKETI

Date ESRS Disclosed

Dec 5, 2014

Country

Turkiye

Region

Central Asia and Turkiye

Last Updated Date

Jun 11, 2022

Environmental Category

B - Limited

Status

Active

Previous Events

Approved : Aug 8, 2014
Signed : Nov 18, 2014
Invested : Nov 20, 2014

Sector

All Other Chemical Product

Industry

Manufacturing

Department

Regional Industry MAS MCT

Project Description

The proposed investment is an IFC equity investment of up to US$25 million in Soda Sanayii’s (‘Soda’ or the ‘company’), the chemicals company of Turkiye Sise ve Cam Fabrikalari A.S. (‘Sisecam’ or the ‘Group’), a leading regional glass producer in Turkey. IFC proposes to purchase shares in Soda from two other Sisecam Group companies, Trakya Cam and Anadolu Cam. IFC’s investment will not be utilized by Soda, but rather by Trakya Cam and Anadolu Cam in targeted resource efficiency investments including waste heat recovery for power generation and glass recycling.

Sisecam, Soda’s parent was established in 1935 by Isbank, one of the largest commercial banks in Turkey. Sisecam is among the 12 largest glass producers in the world with 3.5 million tons of production capacity, and is organized into four main subsidiaries split along business lines: Trakya Cam (flat glass), Pasabahce Cam (tableware), Anadolu Cam (glass packaging) and Soda Sanayii (chemicals). IFC has a long-standing relationship with Sisecam developed over 40 years in Turkey, Russia, Bulgaria and Bosnia (53 % outside Turkey).

At present IFC has outstanding loans to several of the Group’s glass companies and to the company’s soda ash manufacturing subsidiary located in Lukavac, Bosnia Herzegovina, SSL Bosnia (“SSL”). IFC’s most recent investment in SSL was in 2013. Ongoing supervision of the existing investments indicates the Group’s environmental and social performance is generally satisfactory.

Soda produces soda ash in three plants in Turkey (“Mersin”), Bosnia Herzegovina (“SSL”) and Bulgaria (“Sodi”). The total installed soda ash production capacity is around 2 million tonnes per annum (tpa) and the split is as follows; Mersin Plant, Turkey (1.3 million tpa); Lukavac plant, Bosnia Herzegovina (420,000 tpa); and Sodi (363,000 tpa).

In addition, chromium chemicals are produced at the Kromsan plant in Mersin and at Cromital S.p.A in Italy. The total installed capacity of chromium chemicals is as follows; Kromsan plant, Mersin (sodium bichromate -110,000 tpa; basic chromium sulphate - 125,000 tpa; chromic acid - 28,000 tpa) and Cromital plant, Italy (based on powdered basic chromium sulphate - 14,000 tpa). The company’s soda production volume ranks it amongst the top four producers in Europe and top 10 globally. The company holds a strong position in the global chromium chemicals market as the top producer of sodium dichromate and basic chromium sulphate, and is the third largest producer of chromic acid.

Overview of IFC's Scope of Review

The scope of review of this project included assessment of Soda and Sisecam’s environmental, health and safety and social (EHSS) management capacity and performance in relation to IFC’s Performance Standards, national regulatory requirements and the relevant World Bank Group (WBG) Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) Guidelines. The review relied on documents and reports made available by Soda and observation and interviews by IFC staff during a site visit in December 2013 to Soda’s head office and manufacturing plant in Mersin, Turkey. During the visit and via telephonic discussions, meetings and interviews were held with the staff (senior management and that related to project management, human resources, technical, environmental, occupational health and safety), and documents demonstrating Soda and the Group’s management capacity to provide adequate oversight of environmental, social, health and safety performance in conducting business activities were reviewed.

IFC’s appraisal considered environmental and social management plans for the Project and gaps if any between these plans and IFC requirements. Where necessary, corrective measures, intended to close these gaps within a reasonable period of time, are summarized in the paragraphs that follows and in the Environmental and Social Action Plan (ESAP) disclosed with this review summary document. Through implementation of these management plans and the ESAP the Project is expected to be designed and operated in accordance with Performance Standards objective.

E & S Project Categorization and Applicable Standard

Environmental and Social Mitigation Measures

Stakeholder Engagement

Broad Community Support

Environmental & Social Action Plan