Environmental and Social Assessment, Identification of Risks and Impacts
MHP enforces Ukrainian legal requirements to carry out an environmental impact assessment (EIA) studies for all new developments and greenfield projects and evaluate potential negative environmental and social impacts followed by development of the corrective actions prescribed by authorities to avoid, mitigate or compensate identified adverse impacts. Specifically, the Company has finished EIA studies for the new facilities including Vinnytsia poultry complex located near the town of Ladyzhyn, Ukraine. Additionally, MHP has enhanced the E&S management plans for the operational phase of the existing Vinnytsia poultry complex to ensure consistency with IFC PSs and sector specific World Bank Group (WBG) Environment, Health and Safety (EHS) guidelines.
EIA studies for a soybean crushing plant being built within the existing facility’s land plot near the Town of Katerynopil are in progress. MHP will develop and provide to IFC environmental, social and occupational health and safety (“EHS”) management plans for the operational phase as per the ESAP. The plan will address requirements of Ukrainian authorities and the WBG/ IFC guidelines including emissions and effluent levels, waste management, environmental monitoring, and workplace monitoring.
In 2013, the Company developed and is now implementing a corporate procedure for early identification of potential E&S risks and impacts associated with leasing/ acquiring of new agricultural land for crop cultivation. Implementation of the procedure is delegated to the environmental specialists at the individual plants. Additionally, MHP adopted a corporate procedure for control of environmental and occupational health and safety (EHS) performance of contractors. Management of contractors’ EHS performance was improved through revision of the existing procurement/tender procedures for bidders and contracts with winning contractors by including specific environmental and occupational health and safety requirements; regular control of contractors EHS performance.
Policy and Management Programs
MHP developed and implemented an EHS policy in 2013. The policy is consistent with international standards on environmental management and IFC PSs. It provides a framework for the environmental and social assessment and management process. Further, MHP commitments related to environmental protection are disclosed on its website
http://www.mhp.com.ua/en/responsibility/environmental-protection Animal welfare policy consistent with the European Union Directives 98/58/EU и 2007/43/EU is being finalized and adopted. MHP commitments on animal welfare focused on raising animals and minimizing negative effect at slaughter are published on its website:
http://www.mhp.com.ua/en/responsibility/animal-welfare Management programs and plans of the individual production sites are based on policy, commitments, and findings of internal enviro
nmental audits and authorities’ inspections. Plans are developed or updated annually. Moreover, the Company adopted corporate plans and programs for environmental protection, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, pesticide and fertilizer use, waste management. In 2013 MHP developed a program for gradual implementation of the EHS management systems consistent with ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 at the individual production sites being implemented. A timeframe for establishment of the EHS management systems will be provided to IFC according to the attached ESAP.
More than half of individual sites have obtained different combination of ISO 9001, ISO 22000, Global G.A.P., HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points) food safety certificates.
Organizational capacity, competency and training
EHS matters at each individual facility are coordinated by the respective EHS departments/services and plant-level managers as part of their direct responsibilities. The environmental management system and occupational health and safety (OHS) management system are developed and implemented separately by the chief ecologist and the OHS manager correspondingly. The Company has improved and formalized its corporate organizational structure - overall responsibility and authority for MHP EHS matters is delegated to the First Deputy CEO.
Specific EHS courses required by local regulations are systematically delivered. MHP has intended to enhance competency of key staff responsible for regular management of the EHS matters and will provide to IFC a schedule and plan for further training on ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 in the reliable training centres/ consulting companies satisfactory to IFC.
Professional training, staff selection procedures and support of students facilitate retention of competent personnel and continuous professional development.
Emergency Preparedness and Response
Emergency response plans (ERRs) appropriate to specific potential risks including life and fire safety are documented and maintained in accordance with local laws at each individual plant. ERRs are, typically, combination of procedures for using, inspecting, and maintaining emergency response equipment; notification of the public and emergency response agencies; training programs. Plans cover communication with local authorities and municipal rescue services in line with legal requirements.
The visited silos in Ladyzhyn including the sunflower crushing plant are equipped with dust suppression systems where appropriate; explosion safety devices; life and fire (L&FS) means including fire alarm systems, fire hoses, fire extinguishers and detached fire water tanks. Ammonia refrigeration system installed at the meat processing plant has undergone multistage inspections and approvals by relevant supervisory authorities. MHP EHS specialist located in Voronezh, Russia, inspected silos and mechanical workshops on a regular basis including status of gas cleaning equipment an
d aspiration systems for the vertical concrete silos. Lightning protection, electrical equipment and systems were improved according to inspection findings. MHP will conduct an explosion risk assessment, as per ESAP, in its vertical concrete silos in Russia by its own professional staff or a third party expert, both being acceptable by IFC to identify high/ moderate/ low risk areas of dust generation and provide to IFC a copy of the assessment and a corrective plan to ensure that mitigation measures including installation/ renovation of the aspiration systems, production equipment overhaul/ refitting, static electrical discharge, dust monitoring, all electrical equipment including electrical panels are dust proof, procedures for and implementations such as periodical cleaning are in place.
Monitoring and reporting
MHP conducted comprehensive internal environmental due diligence of its individual operations in 2010 and continue annual audits of selected facilities depending on their performance. Facilities were audited including availability of relevant permits and licenses, E&S performance, implementation of local authorities’ prescriptions and management system status. Adopted in 2013, a procedure for senior management review of EHS performance establishes review meetings of internal EHS reports on a quarterly basis. As spelled out in the ESAP, MHP will update its internal reporting system, develop formats for EHS reports approved by MHP senior management and provide the report templates that will bring qualitative and quantitative performance indicators including those listed below to IFC:
(1) Sustainability: energy use per unit (kWh/ton processed or Wh/ bird/ day); water consumption per unit (m3/ton processed or liters/ bird place/ year); carbon footprint (CO2 emitted /tons produced);
(2) Safety: Lost Time Incidence Frequency Rate (LTIFR - Number of injuries per million of hours worked); Accident Free Days (Number of Days since last Lost Time Incident); Number of fatalities and first priority actions to undertake;
(3) Environment: air emissions of NOx, SO2, particulate matter for combustion facilities for different type of fuels; frequency of tests of air emissions and ambient air (dust, odour, noise) at the edge of the nearest residential areas; waste generation per unit (kg/ton processed or g/head); tests and limits of effluent levels; compliance with the local and the WBG/ IFC thresholds; number of independent EHS audits conducted/ year; key findings of independent EHS audits;
(4) Social: grievances from stakeholders received and topics to address; grievances from employees received and topics to address; number of the lawsuit related to labor and work conditions; retention and number of training days provided to new and existing employees.
The external reporting is carried out in accordance with local legal EHS requirements. Reporting to IFC on continuous improvement of E&S performance and the EHS management system will be pr
ovided within the context of the Annual Monitoring Reports (AMR).
Stakeholder Engagement:
The Company maintains various social projects through support and finance contributions to economic vulnerable groups, institutions that care for orphans, children, veterans and religious institutions to address immediate social and economic problems and improve the infrastructure within rural districts where MHP operates. MHP developed and implements a grievance mechanism to receive and respond communities’ concerns. Going further, in 2013, the Company enhanced its external communications with affected communities and developed a comprehensive stakeholder engagement plan (SEP) supporting an ongoing process for stakeholder engagement. The SEP consistent with PS1 provisions and good international practices is based on detailed stakeholder analysis including affected local communities and non-governmental organizations. The plan includes various forms of disclosure and dissemination of information; plans for consultation and participation, and regular reporting on EHS matters.