Key environmental and social issues relating to the project are summarized below, along with specific information about how potential impacts will be addressed by the Company. Upon implementation of the necessary mitigation measures described below and in the attached ESAP, the project will comply with environmental and social requirements, namely IFC’s Performance Standards on Social and Environmental Sustainability and Access to Information Policy, and applicable World Bank/IFC environment, health and safety (EHS) guidelines.
Environmental Policy:
The Company will develop and implement a HSEC Policy to identify, assess and adequately manage existing ESHS risks and impacts from exploration activities. The HSEC Policy will be developed with assistance from IFC, with key components, including the manual, management plans and standard operational procedures (SOPs) developed by Unigold with support from an external international consultant experienced in the use of good international industry practices (GIIP) for this phase of work (See Action 1 of the ESAP).
Based on the findings of the site visit, key management plans and/or SOPs to be developed as part of the HSEC Policy include those addressing pollution prevention (fuel management, spills, dust, noise, etc), solid and liquid waste, erosion control and re-vegetation, footprint management, biodiversity management, surface and ground water resources management, environmental monitoring, occupational, health and safety, emergency response and contingency planning, road safety and transportation, stakeholder engagement, grievance mechanism and land access procedure. Other plans to be developed as part of the HSEC Policy and aligned with the continuous improvement cycle will include an ESHS training plan, an Impacts Identification Procedure and a Non-Compliance Corrective Action Procedure, among others (See Action 1 of the ESAP).
Identification of Risks and Impacts:
The management of risks discussion in this ESRS consists of those associated with exploration, as IFC is only financing exploration and feasibility study activities which have limited impacts on social and environmental receptors. If any of the exploration prospects proceed to the mining development phase, Unigold will prepare the necessary environmental and social impact assessment (ESIA) documentation to demonstrate compliance with IFC’s Performance Standards.
In 2010 about 34% of the population was at or below the national poverty line and this percentage has fluctuated over the years in line with the economic cycle, making expectations for support on improved living conditions and employment in the community high. The Company is aware of this and is taking steps to engage with the local communities to provide information on the Project and manage expectations. Furthermore, the development of a formal Stakeholder Engagement Plan and Communications Plan as part of IFC’s investment will support the Project in providi
ng adequate and timely information to local communities and other key stakeholders, receiving feedback, adequately addressing any concerns or grievances and managing expectations and perceptions.
The Company wholly owns the Neita Concession where drilling efforts are focused. Dominican Republic regulations require the development of a Declaración de Impacto Ambiental, (DIA) to be approved by the Ministry of Environment for any mining exploration work. This DIA includes a characterization of works to be conducted and an impact assessment matrix. The Company has obtained the necessary environmental permits (DIA) for current exploration work at Neita. Reporting on environmental activities as part of the DIA and mitigation measures carried out at the site is submitted by Unigold on a biannual basis to the Ministry of Environment.
As mentioned above, the development of the HSEC policy and management plans/SOPs will assure that exploration activities are carried out in alignment with GIIP and that performance is tracked by the Company.
The western edge of the Neita Concession is located along the Haitian border. At this stage of the development and given the low level of project activities, it is not envisaged that this will result in influx of people to the project site. To date, there has been no cross border migration either to the project site or the neighboring village. However, should the mine progress to development stage, the potential risks of cross-border in-migration will be assessed and the appropriate management approaches developed and implemented.
Management Programs:
Although there is an adequate level of environmental and health and safety management at the site, the Company has not yet developed or formalized any environmental, social or health and safety procedures to manage existing risks. As part of the HSEC Policy to be developed, the necessary management plans and/or SOPs will be developed to incorporate GIIP practice (Action 1 of the ESAP).
Organizational Capacity:
The Company’s current organizational structure includes a CFO, and Chief Operating Officer and Technical Director, and Vice-President of Exploration reporting directly to the President and CEO. In turn, the VP of Exploration oversees the work of a Senior Project Geologist who in turn oversees the contract geologist, technicians and community relations staff. The CFO oversees the work from the Director of Administration who in turn is responsible for logistics, accounting and the camp managing areas. The Company’s senior management values a relationship with IFC to assist the Company carry out its exploration activities in line with GIIP.
In terms of ESHS personnel, the Company has three part-time community relations staff who report to the Senior Project Geologist. Currently the Company does not have an environmental or a health and safety specialist and these responsibilities are carried out by the Senior Project Geologist.
In order to strengthen its E&S capacity, the Company will contract additional ESHS support in the form of an experienced international environmental and social consultant for development of the relevant plans and procedures as part of the HSEC Policy and to assist in their implementation and training. Also, Unigold will hire an experienced EHS specialist who will oversee the implementation of the HSEC Policy during the exploration phase (see Action 2 of the ESAP).
Training:
Health and safety training to staff and contractors on the use of PPE and the identification of risks is done on an ad-hoc basis. The development of the HSEC Policy and a training plan (Action 1 of the ESAP) will address the necessary competency training requirements for this phase of work including frequency, training topics and documentation necessary to assess the level of environmental, social and health and safety awareness of direct workers and contractors.
Monitoring and Review:
The Company was not required to undertake any environmental monitoring as part of the DIA application process. More recently, Unigold hired a local consultant (Empaca Redes) to carry out an environmental audit of the exploration camp which included the sampling of several environmental media. No additional environmental or social baseline studies are being carried out by Unigold at the time.
As part of the development of the HSEC Policy, a monitoring, inspection and audit program will be developed together with key performance indicators (KPIs) to track information on environmental, health and safety and social management, training, incidents and spills, etc. The Company will also develop an Environmental Monitoring Plan to establish monitoring requirements for this phase of work and in preparation for any future ESIA.
Community Investment:
Unigold has in place a community investment program for the communities in the Municipality of Restauración. During the year 2011 – 2012, Unigold completed a number of “quick-win” projects including support to local schools (through the provision of school uniforms, donation to the teacher appreciation day), supporting local supports teams, minor road repairs, installation of a water line, Christmas gift hampers, support to farmers for building canals and water ponds, support to the civil defense for hurricane preparedness.
Reporting:
As part of the environmental permit conditions, the Company submits an environmental report to the local and national offices of the Ministry of Environment on a semi-annual basis. These reports include information on exploration activities carried out during the reporting period, issues such as re-vegetation, any sampling done during the reporting period, management of waste and hydrocarbons, etc. Reporting on health and safety issues to the government is only required for major accidents. The Ministry does not require reporting on land access (i.e. land take, number of land owners e
tc.).
As part of internal reporting, reports on ESHS matters are provided to the Project Geologist and CEO on a weekly basis. However, limited information on statistics and key performance indicators is provided both on environmental and health and safety matters.
As part of IFC’s investment, Unigold will submit an Annual Environmental and Social Monitoring Report (AMR) to IFC to describe its environmental and social performance. As part of the Stakeholder Engagement Plan, the Company will also report regularly to local communities on the progress made on its activities and progress in implementing the Company’s Environmental and Social Action Plan.
Non Applicable PS
PS5 Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement
Regarding PS5 (Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement), this PS is not relevant as current exploration activities only require temporary use of land with limited impacts on local land holders and this undertaken on the basis of willing-seller willing-buyer.
Unigold holds exploration rights for the Neita concession block located in the municipality of Restauración. The area is mostly characterized by agricultural and grazing lands within a forested area. The majority of the users of the area hold customary rights to the land with some holding titles. Unigold plans to undertake a land use survey which will also include ownership patterns.
For its early exploration program (drill pads and small access roads), Unigold acquires access rights from land owners for temporary use of farmlands and grazing areas for a period of approximately three months. Based on information obtained from the Company, the majority of the land owners hold customary rights to the land. Temporary access is negotiated on a willing buyer-willing seller basis and Unigold signs a written agreement with each land owner. Unigold has established fixed rates for different project activities – drill holes, trenches and access roads. For standing crops, rates are negotiated based on current market prices.
In its agreement template currently used, Unigold will include provisions for reinstatement and restoration, the duration of the drilling activities, rates for standing crops, and compensation for lost crops if the drilling activities extend into the next planting season, and details of a contact person for logging grievances.
The Company will develop a Land Use and Compensation Plan (LACP) to outline the principles, guidelines and approaches that will be followed for temporary land access and compensation activities in accordance with PS5 requirements. See Action 6 of the ESAP.
Unigold will document the process followed for compensation of farmers during the early exploration program including records of number of landowners, status of land reinstatement and return of the land etc.
PS6 Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Living Natural Resources:
Regarding PS6 (Biodiversity Conservation and Sustaina
ble Management of Living Natural Resources), no sensitive habitats have been preliminarily identified in the project area with limited impacts from exploration activities on biological resources. However, the Company will carry out a Rapid Biodiversity Assessment (RBA) to evaluate any presence of sensitive amphibians in the area.
Based on a desktop review, the Neita Concession does not lie in any legally protected areas or internationally recognized KBAs/IBAs or AZE sites. The Concession does lie within the Hispaniola Endemic Bird Area (EBA) which stretches across the Dominican Republic and Haiti. Also, on a regional scale, the concession lies within the wider Caribbean Islands Biodiversity Hotspot which runs from Cuba and the Bahamas to Barbados and Grenada.
From a review of the available literature it was also noted that the area of the Neita Concession overlaps with habitat of an amphibian (Eleutherodactylus schmidti) considered as Critically Endangered (CR) by IUCN. This species had a restricted range in the Cordillera Septentrional and Cordillera Central in the Dominican Republic and the Massif du Nord in Haiti. Further review of literature indicates that extensive surveys have been conducted between 1998 and 2000 but no individuals of this species were found in the area and, therefore, it is considered as possibly extinct.
From a visit to several areas around the Concession it was noted that the general habitat is tropical rainforest which has been disturbed in many areas by clear-cutting, agriculture and farming with several areas also under reforestation efforts by the government. The habitat can initially be defined as both modified and natural with some forested areas also present mostly in the hills. It was also noted that timber is harvested in several areas for fuel.
In order to address potential biodiversity related impacts of current activities at Neita, the Company has agreed to carry out a Rapid Biodiversity Assessment (RBA) of its exploration areas with a focus on the identification of the Eleutherodactylus schmidti amphibian. Based on the results of this assessment, the Company will incorporate the necessary management and mitigation measures into its HSEC Policy program and management plans to avoid, reduce or mitigate impacts on sensitive biodiversity values in alignment with the requirements of Performance Standard 6. See Action 7 of the ESAP.
PS7 (Indigenous Peoples) is also not relevant to this project because of the absence of Indigenous People in the area of influence of the Company’s operations. Finally, regarding PS8 (Cultural Heritage), although no cultural resources have been identified the Company will prepare a “chance finds” procedure to be applied in the event of any accidental unearthing of paleontological/cultural relics.